Masks are Dangerous – Here is the Evidence

This website is for information purposes only; we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any disease or medical condition by providing the information contained herein. Before beginning any natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.

Watch what MSM does not want you to see.

‘The HighWire’ host Del Bigtree and his son, Ever, tested masks using an OSHA-approved Carbon-Dioxide meter. Watch as they revealed something about masks that YouTube, Facebook, and other video platforms try hard to censor.   Are you going to take the chance of the neurological injuries wearing a mask can cause?

Masks decrease oxygen levels and increase carbon dioxide levels,  which may be producing a generation of people suffering cognitive impairment and may cause early-onset Alzheimer’s and more serious injuries down the road.

Believing in the mainstream media propaganda campaigns can cost you or your family members your life. In today’s times, you must gather the facts for yourself. They purposely hide life-saving information from you. If you are an MSM believer, we implore you to do your research to bring the truth to the surface. Once you see through the deception, you may never go back.  Corporate interests own MSM and do not have your best interest in mind. They will purposely bombard you with inaccurate information and pour billions of dollars into propaganda campaigns that help big businesses, not you.

Mask Wearing and Serious Health Effects

The authors of a scientific study, Boris Borovoy, Colleen Huber, and Maria Crisler, look at the potential health effects in great detail in their scientific study. Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 1: Friable mask particulate and lung vulnerability

Their recent study looked at loose fibers not secure in masks and the pathological consequences when inhaled, which allows them deep entry into the lungs. The most concerning danger is pulmonary fibrosis which, should you get it; you will not survive.

The Toxicity of the Mask

Disposable face masks are made of synthetic fibers. Here we highlight the safety data of the products that your mask might be made from.

Polyurethane – The Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of polyurethane products provide a list of potential health effects and symptoms. Still, diisocyanates have been known to irritate the eyes, nose, throat, lungs, and skin. They also can cause allergic reactions (sensitization) of the skin and lungs. Polyethylene’s body systems include the integumentary system, respiratory system, immune system, skeletal system, and muscular system.

Polyacrylonitrile – Warning! May cause eye and skin irritation. May cause respiratory and digestive tract irritation. Metabolized cyanide in the body may cause headaches, dizziness, weakness, unconsciousness, convulsions, coma, and possible death. The toxicological properties of this material have not been fully investigated.
Inhalation: May cause respiratory tract irritation. The toxicological properties of this substance have not been fully investigated. Maybe metabolized to cyanide, which in turn act by inhibiting cytochrome oxidase impairing cellular respiration. Inhalation may result in symptoms similar to cyanide poisoning, including tachypnea, hyperpnea (abnormally rapid or deep breathing), and dyspnea (labored breathing) followed rapidly by respiratory depression. Pulmonary edema may occur.
Chronic: Maybe metabolized to cyanide, which in turn acts by inhibiting cytochrome oxidase impairing cellular respiration. Potential cancer hazard.

Polycarbonate – Coarse dust, particulate generated during fabrication can irritate eyes, nasal passages, and upper respiratory system

Polyethylene – When inhaled, it caused proximal scleroderma, Raynaud phenomenon, joint involvement, pulmonary manifestation, and esophageal involvement in some people. Moreover, it may cause asthma. The chemical was also found to be toxic to the immune system. In addition, it was found to be a potential carcinogen.

Respiratory disease caused by synthetic fibers: a new occupational disease

Research on synthetic fibers has shown a correlation between the inhalation of synthetic fibers and various bronchopulmonary diseases, such as asthma, alveolitis, chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, fibrosis, spontaneous pneumothorax, and chronic pneumonia.

Pulmonary fibrosis is not curable in any way. It is deadly, and most people die within five years. It is a horrific disease, and nothing can be done to slow, reverse, cure, or beat it. Not in the allopathic or holistic medicine model.

  • Causes of pulmonary fibrosis can include:
    • Environmental toxins
    • Medications, chronic inflammation
    • Infections
  • Treatment options for pulmonary fibrosis are limited as the disease is progressive (worsening over time).
  • The prognosis (outlook) is poor for pulmonary fibrosis. The survival (life expectancy) for most patients is less than 5 years.

Mask wearing creates a warm, moist environment and harbors fungal spores where mold and fungi are trapped beyond typical airborne levels. If this happens, fungal spores may be dislodged with inhalation. In a condition known as hypersensitivity pneumonitis, lung fibrosis can develop following a heightened immune reaction to inhaled organic dust or occupational chemicals. This condition most often results from inhaling dust contaminated with bacterial, fungal, or animal products.

The study shows that almost immediately after putting on a mask oxygen levels are dropped to 17.4%

OSHA Oxygen Level Standards

The OSHA standards for minimum oxygen levels mainly apply to indoor spaces with ventilation. In addition to mines, the hazard of decreased oxygen concentrations applies to construction workers, shipyards, HVAC, electrical workers, and some manufacturing environments.

To meet the minimum standard set by OSHA, your employer’s workplace must have an oxygen concentration of at least 19.5 percent. This minimum is slightly lower than the normal oxygen concentration of 20.8 to 21 percent in our atmosphere. However, an employer’s failure to meet the minimum would be deficient and considered hazardous. OSHA also sets a maximum safe oxygen level for your workplace.

Symptoms of Oxygen Deficiency

Prolonged exposure in an oxygen-deficient workplace can result in death. However, the primary culprit is a buildup of carbon dioxide, which humans naturally expel when breathing. In oxygen-deficient workplaces, the normal ratio of CO2 and oxygen is out of balance.

Lower availability of oxygen concentration is detrimental to health. The body tries to acquire more oxygen. You struggle and breathe deeper to compensate. Your body is saying you need more oxygen.  Every fiber has the potential to be inhaled. Inhaled cotton fibers.

When we wear a mask, and our oxygen levels drop, the body tries to breathe deeper to get more oxygen. Breathing deeper means the fibers can be loosened and then embedded deep within the lungs. Every fiber has the potential to be inhaled. If we talk while wearing the mask, this has the potential to break down the fibers. Deeper inhalation could produce a concerning health hazard.

child wearing a big mask over entire face

Parents should be aware of what this mask can do to their children.

maks

How many people will become ill from masks?

The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease

Results: Thirty-nine patients (23 men; mean age, 57.2 years) were recruited for participation in the study. Seventy percent of the patients showed a reduction in partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), and 19% developed various degrees of hypoxemia. Wearing an N95 mask significantly reduced the PaO2 level (101.7 +/- 12.6 to 92.7 +/- 15.8 mm Hg, p = 0.006), increased the respiratory rate (16.8 +/- 2.8 to 18.8 +/- 2.7/min, p < 0.001), and increased the occurrence of chest discomfort (3 to 11 patients, p = 0.014) and respiratory distress (1 to 17 patients, p < 0.001). Baseline PaO2 level was the only significant predictor of the magnitude of PaO2 reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Wearing an N95 mask for 4 hours during HD significantly reduced PaO2 and increased respiratory adverse effects in ESRD patients.

A Study that Facemasks are Useless Is Censored and Ignored by MSM

And is now retracted. With all of the fraud, we have to be very suspicious as to why.? Was it because Anthony Fauci said something? More research needed to discuss this.

Although infection fatality rate (number of death cases divided by number of reported cases) initially seems quite high 0.029 (2.9%) , this overestimation related to limited number of COVID-19 tests performed which biases towards higher rates. Given the fact that asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times higher than the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate is considerably less than 1% . This was confirmed by the head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases from US stating, “the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 are similar to those of severe seasonal influenza” , having a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1% . In addition, data from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and general public indicate that the majority of deaths were among older and chronically ill individuals, supporting the possibility that the virus may exacerbates existing conditions but rarely causes death by itself . SARS-CoV-2 primarily affects respiratory system and can cause complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure and death . It is not clear however, what the scientific and clinical basis for wearing facemasks as protective strategy, given the fact that facemasks restrict breathing, causing hypoxemia and hypercapnia and increase the risk for respiratory complications, self-contamination and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions .

Download: Rapid Expert Consultation on the Effectiveness of Fabric Masks for the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 8, 2020) | The National Academies Press (nap.edu)

CONCLUSIONS
There are no studies of individuals wearing homemade fabric masks in the course of their typical activities. Therefore, we have only limited, indirect evidence regarding the effectiveness of such masks for protecting others when made and worn by the general public on a regular basis. That evidence comes primarily from laboratory studies testing the effectiveness of different materials at capturing particles of different sizes. The evidence from these laboratory filtration studies suggests that such fabric masks may reduce the transmission of larger respiratory droplets. There is little evidence regarding the transmission of small aerosolized particulates of the size potentially exhaled by asymptomatic or presymptomatic individuals with COVID-19. The extent of any protection will depend on how the masks are made and used. It will also depend on how mask use affects users’ other precautionary behaviors, including their use of better masks, when those become widely available. Those behavioral effects may undermine or enhance homemade fabric masks’ overall effect on public health. The current level of benefit, if any, is not possible to assess.\

SKM_C250i20110520120 (childrenshealthdefense.org)

[Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance] – PubMed (nih.gov)

“Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil’s sword?” – A physiological hypothesis – PubMed (nih.gov)

The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease – PubMed (nih.gov)

Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers – PubMed (nih.gov)

Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers – PubMed (nih.gov)

FREE TO SHARE – Covid19fyi © – Attribution — Free to copy and share without alteration under the following circumstances

This work may be reproduced and redistributed, in whole or in part, without alteration, provided all copies contain the following:

1.    “© [Article Date] Covid19fyi.com. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Covid19fyi.com

2.    No alterations to the title – and author credit directly below the headline.

3.    An original do-follow hyperlink intact and active going back to the original article must be on the page.

4.    No changes or edits to title, content, hyperlinks, or images are permissible.

Covid19fyi © – Attribution — Free to copy and share without alteration.